Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Manuel Mazza Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Mazza analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Manuel Mazza Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 0 Mazza
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 48.76% of points on their second serve, while Mazza has won 54.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 44.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mazza has won 51.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.99% and 36.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 60.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mazza has saved 56.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 50.77% of matches played (W/L 33/ 32), with Mazza winning 53.85% (W/L 14/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 195), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Mazza has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 88/ 71), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22), where as Mazza has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fatic winning 2 times and Mazza being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Fatic winning 4 and Mazza winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Mazza was at the M25 Santa Margherita Di Pula, 02-10-2019, First, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Mazza have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Mazza 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 1, and Mazza 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 274.25 while Mazza has played against players with an average rank of 201.54.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mazza has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 38.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mazza has converted 55.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
198
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
898
Rank
608
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
57% (343-258)
Career Total W/L
55% (98-80)
40% (10-15)
YTD W/L
71% (5-2)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nerman Fatic vs Manuel Mazza For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fatic VS Mazza
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Manuel Mazza |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:0 | 1:17:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (86/119) | 67% (77/115) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (62/86) | 56% (43/77) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (18/33) | 45% (17/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (8/15) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (55/115) | 33% (39/119) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Manuel Mazza
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 6-2 7-6(3) |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Manuel Mazza
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Manuel Mazza |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (10/15) | 71% (5/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (25/32) | 69% (11/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (257/285) | 56% (81/64) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (6/12) | 71% (5/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 100 | 16 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:36 | 1:29:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 302.16 | 40.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1041/1605) | 54% (205/377) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (709/1041) | 66% (135/205) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (275/564) | 55% (94/172) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (51/132) | 56% (24/43) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (589/1620) | 43% (172/397) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 39% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 39% (9/23) | 71% (5/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 33% (3/1) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
38%
(
8 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Manuel Mazza Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Manuel Mazza
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manuel Mazza
Player
Paul Werren
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Manuel Mazza
48%
(
30 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manuel Mazza
Player
Maxim Zhukov
56%
(
52 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
42 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Manuel Mazza
Player
Saveliy Ivanov
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Manuel Mazza
Player
Gabriel Matuszewski
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Lopez Montagud
Player
Manuel Mazza
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manuel Mazza
Player
Toby Martin
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Mazza Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fatic are available here and Mazza photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
